see many new online search various' cost-effective 'Equipment at the forum to ask questions, each answer to my first question, relieved sigh. Therefore, cost-effective, I would like to talk about this topic alone.
The so-called 'cost-effective', literally speaking that is functional, that is, from both the price and performance of integrated consideration. But it is strange that many newcomers find cost-effective Equipment, I found only see its low price, and never discussed how its performance. For instance, to see a lb packs are so large, other Brands have sold hundreds of thousands of pieces, which packs sold 1,2 100, it was felt that the value of the package is a highly cost-effective. So the fact is what is, let us take a look at:
First, it packs a 60L is so big that it would only sell 1,2 100, from its previous size and price is indeed a value. However, it is size and price, not performance and price. Speaking to the price, it is impossible to UTX the fastener, it is impossible to use YKK zippers, it is impossible to win on Ribbon, it is impossible to use a good solid fabrics. Why? We will lose money because of the. These materials and the overall design of the Backpack directly affects its performance, in other words, this package is big enough, but the performance was poor! It can not be said it's cost-effectiveness. If this must assess the cost-effective package, we count on to an account:
If I spend 800 yuan to buy a relatively good package, the quality of all aspects is also very good, very comfortable carrying, it can use for five years.而我花了200元买了同样大的一个包，背着不舒服且不说它，以这个价钱买的包在一年内坏掉的可能性是90%，到那时候我可能明白了一分价钱一分货的道理，我再买时可能就会再花800元买个好包，但，这时have spent more than 200 yuan. We can calculate this account, 200 yuan package is not very cost-effective? I think we all do, the package is not 200 yuan profit, but paid! In other words, this is cost-effective packet poor!
Not think that I said the theory is, in fact, at a price of the goods at a reason we all know, but shopping at the psychological things always exist, so will this situation. Since I started playing, there used 7,8-Brand, over 10 kinds of styles, from the earliest 91 carried by the relatively good BD, as well as a cheaper goods from the good packets to change deeply feel that the price of a one-goods truth! Also see a lot of cheap quality packet!
The same token, such as Sleeping bags, Tents, clothing, shoes, etc., if too cheap goods, it is usually cost-effective worst.
Then purchase new Equipment when there is nothing to pay attention to? I say a few words in this regard:
First, the newcomers do not understand the knowledge of the Equipment, should choose a reputable outdoor shop to buy, a good outdoor shop sales clerk should be experts in the field of equipment, he should be able to give you a good and reasonable proposal . And, good outdoor shop with a good reputation can be guaranteed after-sales service.
Secondly, in purchasing Equipment, you should consider participation in the preparations for what kind of outdoor sports, mountaineering, climbing, crossing, skiing right ...... these sports equipment requirements are different. There should be objective, targeted to choose equipment. And, if it is ready to participate in mountaineering, climbing such dangerous activities, equipment must be well, to a certain extent, it can increase your safety factor.
Also, the majority of us are the favorite in the self-help tourism, camping, and through such activities, then my suggestion is in their own economic conditions allow, as far as possible to buy good Equipment. After all, we participated in outdoor sports is brought to us in order to enjoy the pleasures of nature, not to suffer to the.
Arbitrarily say some, is to remind the blind pursuit of the so-called 'cost-effective' new people, maybe you buy 'cost-effective' Equipment not only let you suffer terribly, but you will have to pay their own pained money!
The so-called 'cost-effective', literally speaking that is functional, that is, from both the price and performance of integrated consideration. But it is strange that many newcomers find cost-effective Equipment, I found only see its low price, and never discussed how its performance. For instance, to see a lb packs are so large, other Brands have sold hundreds of thousands of pieces, which packs sold 1,2 100, it was felt that the value of the package is a highly cost-effective. So the fact is what is, let us take a look at:
First, it packs a 60L is so big that it would only sell 1,2 100, from its previous size and price is indeed a value. However, it is size and price, not performance and price. Speaking to the price, it is impossible to UTX the fastener, it is impossible to use YKK zippers, it is impossible to win on Ribbon, it is impossible to use a good solid fabrics. Why? We will lose money because of the. These materials and the overall design of the Backpack directly affects its performance, in other words, this package is big enough, but the performance was poor! It can not be said it's cost-effectiveness. If this must assess the cost-effective package, we count on to an account:
If I spend 800 yuan to buy a relatively good package, the quality of all aspects is also very good, very comfortable carrying, it can use for five years.而我花了200元买了同样大的一个包，背着不舒服且不说它，以这个价钱买的包在一年内坏掉的可能性是90%，到那时候我可能明白了一分价钱一分货的道理，我再买时可能就会再花800元买个好包，但，这时have spent more than 200 yuan. We can calculate this account, 200 yuan package is not very cost-effective? I think we all do, the package is not 200 yuan profit, but paid! In other words, this is cost-effective packet poor!
Not think that I said the theory is, in fact, at a price of the goods at a reason we all know, but shopping at the psychological things always exist, so will this situation. Since I started playing, there used 7,8-Brand, over 10 kinds of styles, from the earliest 91 carried by the relatively good BD, as well as a cheaper goods from the good packets to change deeply feel that the price of a one-goods truth! Also see a lot of cheap quality packet!
The same token, such as Sleeping bags, Tents, clothing, shoes, etc., if too cheap goods, it is usually cost-effective worst.
Then purchase new Equipment when there is nothing to pay attention to? I say a few words in this regard:
First, the newcomers do not understand the knowledge of the Equipment, should choose a reputable outdoor shop to buy, a good outdoor shop sales clerk should be experts in the field of equipment, he should be able to give you a good and reasonable proposal . And, good outdoor shop with a good reputation can be guaranteed after-sales service.
Secondly, in purchasing Equipment, you should consider participation in the preparations for what kind of outdoor sports, mountaineering, climbing, crossing, skiing right ...... these sports equipment requirements are different. There should be objective, targeted to choose equipment. And, if it is ready to participate in mountaineering, climbing such dangerous activities, equipment must be well, to a certain extent, it can increase your safety factor.
Also, the majority of us are the favorite in the self-help tourism, camping, and through such activities, then my suggestion is in their own economic conditions allow, as far as possible to buy good Equipment. After all, we participated in outdoor sports is brought to us in order to enjoy the pleasures of nature, not to suffer to the.
Arbitrarily say some, is to remind the blind pursuit of the so-called 'cost-effective' new people, maybe you buy 'cost-effective' Equipment not only let you suffer terribly, but you will have to pay their own pained money!
