recently, in - the curtain falls, "2005 Chinese and foreign construction and Cultural Forum" from the construction industry at home and abroad, cultural experts and scholars on China Architectural Culture serious omission for serious reflection, that the Chinese economy over the past 20 years of heavy, light mass culture in modern urban construction left many questions, such as a large number of historical and cultural heritage value, the destruction of buildings, cities lose their characteristics, more than 600 cities, "a 1000 City", no basic personality, and so on. Experts shout: If no attention to these issues, a continuation of 5,000 years of Chinese history and culture to the possibility of a fault.
Experts call is not alarmist. City building is a mirror of urban culture, architecture and culture should reflect a long history of cultural transmission Chinese blood. City building if losing their national aesthetics and culture, China has no architectural style of its own, it is very regrettable.
Why more than 600 cities, "a 1000 City", no personality? Possible reasons are many, according to the author's view, the key to the problem lies in the city planning and building awareness of the Chief Executive is too strong, too much authority to intervene, and we go blindly pursuing "modernization" Annihilation of the urban construction should be national characteristics and cultural character.
Throughout the development process in many cities, it is not difficult to find two illnesses, First vulnerable urban planning officials about personal power, and too much into the party leaders, especially the "top leaders" of the will and preferences; Two of the city building for the blind greed Yang, the pursuit of style, luxury, "modernization." This is often the fault of one derived from the illnesses. Cai city is a display of the best stage performance, the best embody the "Crown term for the benefit of one party"; The city is the best color reproduction is the "modernization": the broad road Square, the proliferation of high-rise buildings, beautiful green fountain; The characteristics of a national culture and urban construction construction is too "sour" gas, enough "modernization", it is difficult to "eye" effect and display performance, it was abandoned officials fraudster became the inevitable choice. Every city in the same mode of thinking and create a "modern" city "looks" How can a city not 1000, stereotyped?
Author believes that the pursuit of individual cities, urban development transmission by blood culture, the key to get rid of urban planning and construction of the "Executive consciousness." Executive planning decisions will bring two drawbacks: First, a planning "inherent weaknesses", "malnutrition." Urban planning has a very strong professional leadership cadre is not experts, once the city runs counter to a scientific and rational development of the personal will on planning, such planning is bound to "short-lived plan." 2 is a plan coming, "former officials, an ambitious" for the next leadership will be supplying or planning a change, planning the stability it lost.
Abandon "Chief Executive sense," we should strengthen the planning legislation. The introduction of the Town Planning through the necessary legal proceedings, a legally established, any unauthorized person shall ensure that scientific urban planning in the implementation of intervention and without power "against." Secondly, we should attach importance to the voice of the masses. In theory, cities are all members of the "public property", everyone has the right to speak. Urban planning, particularly the layout of buildings, models and be open, transparent, public records, in particular, listen to experts and scholars, has repeatedly argued that swallow. City building where the history and culture of professional, more experts should be given the right to participate.
Experts call is not alarmist. City building is a mirror of urban culture, architecture and culture should reflect a long history of cultural transmission Chinese blood. City building if losing their national aesthetics and culture, China has no architectural style of its own, it is very regrettable.
Why more than 600 cities, "a 1000 City", no personality? Possible reasons are many, according to the author's view, the key to the problem lies in the city planning and building awareness of the Chief Executive is too strong, too much authority to intervene, and we go blindly pursuing "modernization" Annihilation of the urban construction should be national characteristics and cultural character.
Throughout the development process in many cities, it is not difficult to find two illnesses, First vulnerable urban planning officials about personal power, and too much into the party leaders, especially the "top leaders" of the will and preferences; Two of the city building for the blind greed Yang, the pursuit of style, luxury, "modernization." This is often the fault of one derived from the illnesses. Cai city is a display of the best stage performance, the best embody the "Crown term for the benefit of one party"; The city is the best color reproduction is the "modernization": the broad road Square, the proliferation of high-rise buildings, beautiful green fountain; The characteristics of a national culture and urban construction construction is too "sour" gas, enough "modernization", it is difficult to "eye" effect and display performance, it was abandoned officials fraudster became the inevitable choice. Every city in the same mode of thinking and create a "modern" city "looks" How can a city not 1000, stereotyped?
Author believes that the pursuit of individual cities, urban development transmission by blood culture, the key to get rid of urban planning and construction of the "Executive consciousness." Executive planning decisions will bring two drawbacks: First, a planning "inherent weaknesses", "malnutrition." Urban planning has a very strong professional leadership cadre is not experts, once the city runs counter to a scientific and rational development of the personal will on planning, such planning is bound to "short-lived plan." 2 is a plan coming, "former officials, an ambitious" for the next leadership will be supplying or planning a change, planning the stability it lost.
Abandon "Chief Executive sense," we should strengthen the planning legislation. The introduction of the Town Planning through the necessary legal proceedings, a legally established, any unauthorized person shall ensure that scientific urban planning in the implementation of intervention and without power "against." Secondly, we should attach importance to the voice of the masses. In theory, cities are all members of the "public property", everyone has the right to speak. Urban planning, particularly the layout of buildings, models and be open, transparent, public records, in particular, listen to experts and scholars, has repeatedly argued that swallow. City building where the history and culture of professional, more experts should be given the right to participate.
